• About
    • About the FIA
    • Priorities
    • Our Team
    • Brainstorming Board
    • Partners and Affiliates
    • Contact Us
  • News + Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Videos
    • Newsletters
    • @FIAumd
    • In the Media
  • Spark Grants
    • Spark Grants Overview
    • Spark Grants FAQ
    • 2012-2015 Seed Grants
    • 2012-2015 Seed Grant Winners
  • Special Topics
    • SearchReSearch
    • Curated Topics
FIA

SearchReSearch

SearchResearch Challenge (9/1/16): How do you make sense of obscure technobabble?

Dan Russell • September 1, 2016
 SearchReSearch
Republished with permission from SearchReSearch
SearchResearch Challenge (9/1/16): How do you make sense of obscure technobabble? Dan Russell

Generally speaking,
I'm fairly easy-to-get-along kind of guy...


Not much really irritates me.

But one thing that DOES irritate me is when people needlessly make something simple into something that's purposefully obfuscated and hard to understand. This is technobabble at its worst.

Here's an example of what I mean:

Sign in a local gym.
Why do they write like that?

The idea here is simple--the gym now stocks chocolate milk in the fridge. Great! That's fine, and maybe even a good idea. What look what happens next...

"It offers an ideal 2:1 carbohydrate to protein ratio and includes branched chain amino acids that accelerate recovery."

I think I'm a fairly literate person, and yet when I read this, I have no idea if it's true, or just bafflegab.

What makes a "2:1 carbohydrate to protein ratio" ideal? Ideal for what? Why does including "branched chain amino acids" accelerate recovery?

The thing is, we all see texts like this all the time. We see them in advertising, in op-ed pieces in the news media, we hear people saying stuff that sounds wonderfully technical ("branched chain amino acids") but that we have no way to evaluate it.

You know that 99 people out of 100 will read this and start to believe that "chocolate milk really does accelerate recovery" and that a "2:1 ratio of carbos to protein is an ideal ratio."

But of course, SearchResearch readers are not just anyone--we tend to check these things out, we try to dig into the topic and understand what's really going on. This is what reporters, scholars, and people-who-read-critically do all the time. Here's a chance for us to dig behind the scenes and understand the background.

So this week's Challenge is in two parts:

1. What does that sign really mean? (Is a 2:1 carbohydrate to protein ratio really good? If so, for what? What do "branched chain amino acids" have to do with accelerating recovery? And are they really something special in chocolate milk? Would it be the same if I ate a chocolate bar and drank a glass of milk??)
2. Do you have any examples of signs like this? (That is, ones that make grand claims, but are not understandable without a Master's degree in chemistry, or biology, or some other field? If so, share them with us!)

I suspect that you'll start seeing examples of signage like this everywhere (now that you're attuned to it). I hope I won't make you continuously irritated by these signs!

On the other hand, it's totally possible that this makes complete sense. This is what we want to determine. Is all of this sign true? (And I just didn't have enough background to understand it?) Or is this just plan technobabble?

As always, tell us the path you used to figure out the carbs/protein ratio goodness factor, and what you did to understand the relationship between branched amino acids and chocolate milk!

Share and enjoy.

Search on!

------
P.S. Gentle Readers: This month, (September, 2016) is a time when I'll be in and out of internet connectivity. I know I'll be offline next Monday, so expect my answer next Wednesday or so. The next several weeks will be like this--don't panic--it's just vacation travel in Wifi-free zones.

Share

Comments

This post was republished. Comments can be viewed and shared via the original site.
13 comments

About the Author

Dan RussellDan Russell

I study the way people search and research. I guess that makes me an anthropologist of search. While I work at Google, my blog and G+ posts reflects my own thoughts and not those of my employer. I am FIA's Future-ist in Residence. More »

Recent News

  • Deepfakes and the Future of Facts
    Deepfakes and the Future of FactsSeptember 27, 2019
  • Book cover for Joy of Search by Daniel M. Russell
    The Joy of Search: A Google Insider’s Guide to Going Beyond the BasicsSeptember 26, 2019
  • The Future of Facts in a ‘Post-Truth’ World
    The Future of Facts in a ‘Post-Truth’ WorldMay 15, 2018
  • The Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality and Immersive Storytelling
    The Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality and Immersive StorytellingJune 6, 2017

More »

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events scheduled. Please check back later.
Event Archive »
Video Archive »

Join Email List

SearchReSearch

  • SearchResearch Challenge (3/22/23):  What do you call the sediment that blocks a river from flowing to the sea?
    SearchResearch Challenge (3/22/23): What do you call the sediment that blocks a river from flowing to the sea?March 22, 2023
  • Answer: What do these everyday symbols mean?
    Answer: What do these everyday symbols mean?March 15, 2023
  • SearchResearch Challenge (3/8/23): What do these everyday symbols mean?
    SearchResearch Challenge (3/8/23): What do these everyday symbols mean?March 8, 2023
  • PSA:  Read Clive Thompson’s article about how he does research
    PSA: Read Clive Thompson’s article about how he does researchMarch 3, 2023

More »

University of Maryland logo
Robert W. Deutsch Foundation logo
Google logo
Barrie School
Library of Congress logo
State of Maryland logo
National Archives logo
National Geographic Society logo
National Park Service logo
Newseum logo
Sesame Workshop logo
Smithsonian logo
WAMU
© 2023 The Future of Information Alliance, University of Maryland | Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility