• About
    • About the FIA
    • Priorities
    • Our Team
    • Brainstorming Board
    • Partners and Affiliates
    • Contact Us
  • News + Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Videos
    • Newsletters
    • @FIAumd
    • In the Media
  • Spark Grants
    • Spark Grants Overview
    • Spark Grants FAQ
    • 2012-2015 Seed Grants
    • 2012-2015 Seed Grant Winners
  • Special Topics
    • SearchReSearch
    • Curated Topics
FIA

SearchReSearch

Fermi Estimation again (Part 2)

Dan Russell • October 4, 2018
 SearchReSearch
Republished with permission from SearchReSearch
Fermi Estimation again (Part 2) Dan Russell

Estimation is an art...

... that deserves practice. And by practice, I mean that you very deliberately look at your mistakes and learn from them.

In an earlier post about Fermi Estimation, I showed how I estimated Enrico Fermi's height by this method. Here's an infographic showing what I did.



That's great.

HOWEVER... As good as estimation is, it's worth checking your work from time to time in order to learn where you can be better.

In that earlier estimation post, Regular Reader Chris wrote in with a great comment. Here's what he wrote:

As Jon said in an earlier post, the average size Italian was 5 feet 6, but I would say he is below average height. My estimates would make him between 5 and 5"3"
Using this image and assuming an bench height of about 30 inches, this would make him only 60 inches tall (5 feet). Using this image with Robert Oppenheimer (on the left) I estimate him [Fermi] at about 5'2". According to the NY Times Obituary, Oppenheimer was 6 ft... Likewise in this photo he [Fermi] is a good foot shorter than Chancellor Hutchins (right) who was 6'3" according to Commentary Magazine.

Aside from being a GREAT example of using photos to estimate height (rule of thumb: use more than one photo to verify; also get the heights of other items in the photos), this also bring up another valuable estimation heuristic: Always double check your work.

What went wrong in my original post? That's easy to spot: My original estimate of his head size was 9.4 inches (21.9 cm). Where did THAT number come from ? From two sources: (1) my estimate of his head size by comparison with the control panel behind him. I know the size of those control knobs, and I estimated from that. (2) I measured my own head size. Since the two numbers were close, I went with that number.

Thing is, I'm taller than Oppenheimer and a bit shorter than Hutchins. So it's not a surprise that my head measurement would produce a fairly tall estimate.

Chris showed us a great estimation validation method--Look at the person side-by-side with known people (and known heights).




Here's another picture showing three famous physicists: E. O. Lawrence, Enrico Fermi, and Isidor Isaac Rabi standing side-by-side. A quick search for Lawrence shows his height at 6 feet (182.8 cm). A quick search for Rabi shows his height at 5' 4" (162.5 cm) So this estimate by photograph is probably pretty accurate. Fermi was a bit shorter than his friends, right around 5' 3" or so.


Estimation Lesson


1. If you take an initial estimate and multiply it by 7.5, then any error you have in your initial guess is going to be magnified by 7.5! Caution: Make sure your initial data is pretty close before you go multiplying it by a fairly large facto.

2. It's always good to have two very different ways of estimating. In this case, a quick photo check would have shown that my original estimate was off. I'll do that next time for sure!



Estimate on!




Share

Comments

This post was republished. Comments can be viewed and shared via the original site.
1 comment

About the Author

Dan RussellDan Russell

I study the way people search and research. I guess that makes me an anthropologist of search. While I work at Google, my blog and G+ posts reflects my own thoughts and not those of my employer. I am FIA's Future-ist in Residence. More »

Recent News

  • Deepfakes and the Future of Facts
    Deepfakes and the Future of FactsSeptember 27, 2019
  • Book cover for Joy of Search by Daniel M. Russell
    The Joy of Search: A Google Insider’s Guide to Going Beyond the BasicsSeptember 26, 2019
  • The Future of Facts in a ‘Post-Truth’ World
    The Future of Facts in a ‘Post-Truth’ WorldMay 15, 2018
  • The Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality and Immersive Storytelling
    The Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality and Immersive StorytellingJune 6, 2017

More »

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events scheduled. Please check back later.
Event Archive »
Video Archive »

Join Email List

SearchReSearch

  • Answer: What do these everyday symbols mean?
    Answer: What do these everyday symbols mean?March 15, 2023
  • SearchResearch Challenge (3/8/23): What do these everyday symbols mean?
    SearchResearch Challenge (3/8/23): What do these everyday symbols mean?March 8, 2023
  • PSA:  Read Clive Thompson’s article about how he does research
    PSA: Read Clive Thompson’s article about how he does researchMarch 3, 2023
  • Answer: World’s largest waterfall?
    Answer: World’s largest waterfall?March 2, 2023

More »

University of Maryland logo
Robert W. Deutsch Foundation logo
Google logo
Barrie School
Library of Congress logo
State of Maryland logo
National Archives logo
National Geographic Society logo
National Park Service logo
Newseum logo
Sesame Workshop logo
Smithsonian logo
WAMU
© 2023 The Future of Information Alliance, University of Maryland | Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility